SİTE İÇERİĞİ

The images of negotiations around prostitution that Ebru Şimşek claimed were taken under pressure, at gunpoint, were watched by the members of the 2nd Criminal Court of Second Instance and the official expert witnesses. The report in which the court asked expert witness Çağlar Goksu his opinion of the images concluded that: “the bedroom where the hidden camera images were recorded WAS NOT THE SAME PLACE AS that in the villa at the address (where Ebru Şimşek claimed they were taken)…” This significant proof that there was absolutely no truth to Ebru Şimşek’s allegations was not reported in any press publishing organ.

Ebru Şimşek’in görüntülerindeki ev ile Sayın Adnan Oktar’ın bulunduğu iddia edilen evin aynı olmaması ile ilgili Sayın Adnan Oktar’ın açıklamalarını buradan izleyebilirsiniz. >>

Image of the house where Ebru Şimşek was.	Image of the house where Adnan Oktar was alleged to be.
The load-bearing systems of the villa in the Istinye district of Istanbul and the house where the immoral negotiations took place are completely different. The structure in the Ebru Şimşek images was built according to the “concrete support system” (in which the joists suspended from the ceiling can be seen.)	The villa in Istinye, however, was built according to the “buried system” (in which the beams are invisible as they are buried inside the ceiling.)

Click for read all of them >>